Treatment of wounds colonized by multidrug resistant organisms in immune-compromised patients: a retrospective case series

BACKGROUND Immune-compromised patients incur a high risk of surgical wound dehiscence and colonization by multidrug resistant organisms. Common treatment has been debridement and spontaneous secondary healing.We report on the results obtained in nine such patients whose wounds were treated by debridement, negative pressure dressing and direct closure. METHODS All immune-compromised patients referred to our Institution between March 1, 2010 and November 30, 2011 for dehiscent abdominal wounds growing multidrug resistant organisms were treated by serial wound debridements and negative pressure dressing. They were primarily closed, despite positive microbiological cultures, when clinical appearance was satisfactory.As a comparison, records from patients treated between March 1, 2008 and February 28, 2010 who, according to our Institution's policy at that time, had been left to heal by secondary intention, were retrieved and examined. RESULTS Nine patients were treated by direct wound closure, five had been treated previously by secondary intention healing.Overall, ten patients had received liver transplant, 1 kidney transplant, 1 was HIV infected, 1 suffered from multi-organ failure, 1 was undergoing hemodialysis.Wound dehiscence involved skin and subcutaneous layers in all patients, in two the muscular layer was also involved.Mean healing time was significantly shorter in patients treated more recently by primary intention in comparison with historical patients (28 vs 81 days). The only complication observed was a small superficial abscess that developed around a non-absorbable stitch 10 months after closure in a patient treated by primary closure. CONCLUSIONS According to our results, fast healing can be safely obtained by closure of a clinically healthy wound, despite growth of multidrug resistant organisms, even in immune-compromised patients.